UROP Research Mentor Project Submission Portal: Submission #1179

Submission information
Submission Number: 1179
Submission ID: 20491
Submission UUID: c15e86f2-b1dd-4cca-9040-8266e7cf29a8

Created: Fri, 08/15/2025 - 04:46 PM
Completed: Fri, 08/15/2025 - 04:51 PM
Changed: Tue, 08/26/2025 - 09:37 AM

Remote IP address: 128.186.14.101
Submitted by: Anonymous
Language: English

Is draft: No
Primary Research Mentor Name Steven Lenhert
Research Mentor Preferred Pronouns
When potential research assistants are reaching out via email, what is your preferred honorific? Dr.
Contact Email (FSU Email if affiliated) lenhert@bio.fsu.edu
Position Title Faculty
FSU College (if applicable) Arts and Sciences
FSU Department or Non-FSU Organization Affiliation Florida State University
Headshot (optional) Lenhert_photo.jpg
Research Assistant Supervisor (if different from above) Vincent Tocci
Research Assistant Supervisor Preferred Pronouns
Research Assistant Supervisor Preferred Honorific?
Contact Email (FSU Email if affiliated) vmt19@fsu.edu
Name of Other Faculty/Collaborator(s) (if applicable) Vincent N. Tocci
Other Faculty/Collaborator(s) Preferred Pronouns
Other Faculty/Collaborator(s) Preferred Honorific?
Contact Email (FSU Email if affiliated)
Title of the Project Science prediction market
Project Keywords experiment, economics, STEM, design, hypothesis
Are you currently looking for research assistants? Yes
Number of Research Assistants Needed 6
Relevant Research Assistant Major(s) Open to all majors
Project Location: On FSU Main Campus
If the project location is off campus, does the research assistant(s) need to provide their own transportation?
Please select the choice that most accurately describes your expectations for the research assistant(s): Partially Remote
Approximately how many hours a week would the research assistant(s) need to work? 5-10
Roughly what time frame do you expect research assistant(s) to work? Flexible schedule (Combination of business and outside of business. TBD between student and research mentor.)
Overall Research Project Description What is the difference between a good and bad science experiment? This is a question that was thoroughly answered by Karl Popper in the early 20th century. He came to the now widely accepted conclusion that good science involves falsifiable hypotheses, while pseudoscience is unfalsifiable. Popper explained the reason for this rule nicely in an article entitled, "Science as Falsification”.1 Briefly, the idea is that science should answer questions to which we do not already know the answer. Theories and hypothesis that have a chance to be proven wrong through experimental observation are therefore valuable contributions to our advancement of knowledge, while theories and hypotheses that have no risk of being wrong do not increase knowledge. This “demarcation line” so nicely distinguishes science from pseudoscience, that I propose to take it one step further – can we quantify the amount of knowledge gained by an experiment by making predictions and measuring how much of a chance it is perceived to have of falsifying a hypothesis? Furthermore, the predictive value of completed science is what makes technology possible.
This project will set up a new kind of scientific evaluation system.2 A scientist can propose a scientific question, hypothesis, and experiment to test the hypothesis. That scientist can provide possible outcomes of the experiment, along with proposed probabilities for each outcome. Reviewers can then predict the outcomes and wager points to indicate their level of confidence. The value of the knowledge to be gained by the experiment can then be gauged by how much wagering takes place, as well as what the odds are for different outcomes.
Reference:
1 Science as Falsification, by Karl Popper
https://staff.washington.edu/lynnhank/Popper-1.pdf
2 Science Prediction Market
https://www.bio.fsu.edu/lenhertgroup/prediction_market.php
Research Tasks The students will work to set up a prediction market using a point system available to researchers and others who may be interested in participating. Historical examples and experiments from the scientific literature will be selected. The experiments will be presented without providing the results and the participants will guess or predict the outcomes. The market will be extended to real experiments in the Lenhert lab as well as other labs.
Skills that research assistant(s) may need: Required: Critical thinking, communication
Recommended: STEM, business, marketing, management, finance, economics
Mentoring Philosophy Mentoring Philosophy
I seek to understand student’s goals and current abilities and to provide guidance to enable them to achieve their goals. This involves providing opportunities as they appear. Examples of opportunities could be an experiment that the student could carry out, coauthorship on a publication, or involvement in a collaboration. As an interdisciplinary scientist, I value different ways of thinking and approaching research tasks. When working in groups I look for synergy. If I’m teaching a student a skill that I have myself, then I demonstrate it and then let the student repeat it. I also tend to think of my students as collaborators and appreciate learning from them as well. I use, and encourage use of deliberate practice, which is an approach to developing expertise based on solving well designed achievable goals using feedback and guidance from a mentor. I meet at least once a week with my research group where we discuss our research, get feedback from each other, and identify achievable goals. Examples of research goals could be to take steps towards constructing a device, design or carry out an experiment, analyze a data set, search the literature for relevant papers, work on some scientific writing and communication. I continue to practice these skills myself and to improve my mentoring as well, doing my best to be a good example. As Isaac Asimov once wrote, “education is not something that can be finished.”
Reference:
https://jasonhaaheim.com/how-did-scientist-become-timpanist-met-orchestra/
Please provide a link to your publications, a video clip, or a website for your research project (if applicable): https://www.bio.fsu.edu/lenhertgroup/prediction_market.php
Please add any additional information here (if applicable):
Are you interested in participating in the UROP Research Mentor Roundtable? Yes
Roundtable times and Zoom links Wednesday September 3rd, 2:30-3:00pm (https://fsu.zoom.us/j/93156037878)
Roundtable Info
  • Day: Wednesday, September 3
    Start Time: 2:30
    End Time: 3:00
    Zoom Link: https://fsu.zoom.us/j/93156037878
Mentor Handbook, FAQs, and Communication Yes
UROP Performance Evaluation Yes
Materials Grant Yes
UROP Poster Presentation Yes
Year 2025
update url https://cre.fsu.edu/urop-research-mentor-project-submission-portal?element_parents=elements/research_mentor_information/headshot_optional_&ajax_form=1&_wrapper_format=drupal_ajax&token=nti8SjssXUsG_TmKfems-1Eu599iPM2O-3p3qHU73Xk