UROP Research Mentor Project Submission Portal: Submission #803
Submission information
Submission Number: 803
Submission ID: 14641
Submission UUID: 9264e26b-b75b-4e2d-b21d-a353d162091f
Submission URI: /urop-research-mentor-project-submission-portal
Submission Update: /urop-research-mentor-project-submission-portal?token=QuPJDpdbttZiKc0QbvprX6FFavbCIt515h87rEwSzG8
Created: Thu, 08/15/2024 - 04:54 PM
Completed: Thu, 08/15/2024 - 04:58 PM
Changed: Fri, 09/13/2024 - 03:51 PM
Remote IP address: 128.186.217.253
Submitted by: Anonymous
Language: English
Is draft: No
Webform: UROP Project Proposal Portal
Submitted to: UROP Research Mentor Project Submission Portal
Research Mentor Information
Keller Sheppard
{Empty}
{Empty}
Faculty
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Additional Research Mentor(s)
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
{Empty}
Overall Project Details
National Estimates of Police Assaults: Exploring New Data Sources
Police; Violence; Crime; Crowdsourced Data
No
3
Open to all majors
On FSU Main Campus
{Empty}
Partially Remote
5-10
Flexible schedule (Combination of business and outside of business. TBD between student and research mentor.)
Police violence represents a pressing public policy issue, yet national data on this topic has been lacking. While recent advancements have been made in tracking police use of fatal force through media-driven and crowdsourced databases, comparable efforts to track assaults on police officers have been insufficient. The Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) program, a longstanding national dataset, has been the only significant source of such data. However, LEOKA has been plagued by issues of underreporting and reliability, raising concerns about its effectiveness in accurately capturing the scope of the problem. Fortunately, two new reporting systems have emerged to potentially address the shortcomings of LEOKA and shed light on national trends in assaults on the police.
The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a detailed crime data collection system managed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the United States. Unlike the traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS), which provides aggregate crime data, NIBRS offers a more granular and comprehensive dataset by collecting detailed information on individual crime incidents and arrests. This includes the circumstances and context of each crime, the characteristics of the victims and offenders, and specific information about the location, time, and nature of the offense. Most importantly for police violence research, victim information now enables research to identify offenses in which a law enforcement officer was reported as a victim.
The National Gun Violence Archive (GVA) is an independent research and data collection initiative that tracks gun-related violence across the United States. Founded in 2013, the project aims to provide accurate and comprehensive data on incidents of gun violence, including fatal and non-fatal shootings, mass shootings, accidents, and defensive use of firearms. The GVA's data is widely used by policymakers, researchers, media outlets, and advocacy groups to understand the scope and impact of gun violence in the U.S. Recent studies have utilized the GVA to identify violent incidents in which law enforcement officers are victims of gun violence.
The research project aims to conduct a comparative analysis of these NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA and their suitability for research on violence against the police. The study will focus on evaluating the accuracy, consistency, and comprehensiveness of each data source, providing a nuanced understanding of how violence against law enforcement is recorded and reported. To this end, we will better understand potential biases or gaps in the data, such as underreporting or overrepresentation of specific incidents. Through quantitative analysis and qualitative assessment, the research aims to offer recommendations for improving data collection practices and enhancing the reliability of information used in research and policymaking. Research assistants would assist in conducting literature reviews, cleaning data, and assisting with quantitative and qualitative comparisons.
The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a detailed crime data collection system managed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the United States. Unlike the traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS), which provides aggregate crime data, NIBRS offers a more granular and comprehensive dataset by collecting detailed information on individual crime incidents and arrests. This includes the circumstances and context of each crime, the characteristics of the victims and offenders, and specific information about the location, time, and nature of the offense. Most importantly for police violence research, victim information now enables research to identify offenses in which a law enforcement officer was reported as a victim.
The National Gun Violence Archive (GVA) is an independent research and data collection initiative that tracks gun-related violence across the United States. Founded in 2013, the project aims to provide accurate and comprehensive data on incidents of gun violence, including fatal and non-fatal shootings, mass shootings, accidents, and defensive use of firearms. The GVA's data is widely used by policymakers, researchers, media outlets, and advocacy groups to understand the scope and impact of gun violence in the U.S. Recent studies have utilized the GVA to identify violent incidents in which law enforcement officers are victims of gun violence.
The research project aims to conduct a comparative analysis of these NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA and their suitability for research on violence against the police. The study will focus on evaluating the accuracy, consistency, and comprehensiveness of each data source, providing a nuanced understanding of how violence against law enforcement is recorded and reported. To this end, we will better understand potential biases or gaps in the data, such as underreporting or overrepresentation of specific incidents. Through quantitative analysis and qualitative assessment, the research aims to offer recommendations for improving data collection practices and enhancing the reliability of information used in research and policymaking. Research assistants would assist in conducting literature reviews, cleaning data, and assisting with quantitative and qualitative comparisons.
Research tasks
All the required research can be completed using College of Criminology and Criminal Justice computers or student personal computers with remote access. The project tasks include the following:
1) Compiling prior research on police assaults and coding information on data sources
2) Downloading and cleaning raw data from NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA on police assaults
3) Assisting the research mentor with the quantitative and qualitative analyses comparing the NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA data
4) Co-authoring a manuscript on the finding of the research project for publication in a peer-reviewed journal
All the required research can be completed using College of Criminology and Criminal Justice computers or student personal computers with remote access. The project tasks include the following:
1) Compiling prior research on police assaults and coding information on data sources
2) Downloading and cleaning raw data from NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA on police assaults
3) Assisting the research mentor with the quantitative and qualitative analyses comparing the NIBRS, GVAs, and LEOKA data
4) Co-authoring a manuscript on the finding of the research project for publication in a peer-reviewed journal
While there are no required skills, familiarity with locating and reviewing peer-reviewed research and data management skills in excel, STATA, or R would be beneficial. This is a learning and professional development opportunity, and all skills required for the project can be learned over the course of the year.
In my role as a research mentor, I strive to not simply provide a list of instructions but rather immerse team members in the process by explaining each task’s contribution to the broader research project. This applies to all phases of the research project, from planning and data collection to writing and submitting for peer review. Promoting active involvement in these activities fosters a sense of ownership and accountability that enables a team-based approach to thrive. If this is done effectively, I believe research assistants and research mentors function as collaborative partners, where each brings special skills and perspectives to enhance the project.
Further, I believe research should be a fun experience for both new assistants and mentors. I entered academia because I fell in love with the research process because I had opportunities to work with passionate individuals that wanted to address important questions about crime, the police, violence, and other criminological topics.
Further, I believe research should be a fun experience for both new assistants and mentors. I entered academia because I fell in love with the research process because I had opportunities to work with passionate individuals that wanted to address important questions about crime, the police, violence, and other criminological topics.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=OFCah-QAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
{Empty}
Yes
Wednesday, Sept. 4 12:30 pm (https://fsu.zoom.us/j/95793964728)
Thursday, Sept. 5 2:00 pm (https://fsu.zoom.us/j/93255187177)
Thursday, Sept. 5 2:00 pm (https://fsu.zoom.us/j/93255187177)
{Empty}
UROP Program Elements
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
{Empty}
2024
https://cre.fsu.edu/urop-research-mentor-project-submission-portal?element_parents=elements/research_mentor_information/headshot_optional_&ajax_form=1&_wrapper_format=drupal_ajax&token=QuPJDpdbttZiKc0QbvprX6FFavbCIt515h87rEwSzG8