Research Symposium

26th annual Undergraduate Research Symposium, April 1, 2026

Hudson Khan Poster Session 4: 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm / Poster #52


7A1A4668.jpg

BIO


Hudson Khan is a freshman at Florida State University pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Finance. He is a member of the Presidential Scholars Program and participates in the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program. Hudson is actively involved on campus through organizations specifically in the Finance Society. After college, he plans to pursue a career in investment banking.

Understanding the Range of Mentorship Within the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program

Authors: Hudson Khan, Alicia Batailles
Student Major: Finance
Mentor: Alicia Batailles
Mentor's Department: Center for Undergraduate Research and Academic Engagement (CRE)
Mentor's College: Center for Undergraduate Research and Academic Engagement (CRE)
Co-Presenters: Parini Mehta

Abstract


Mentorship is an integral piece of the undergraduate research experience (URE). The quality of mentorship can impact the outcomes of a URE. At Florida State University (FSU), hundreds of undergraduate students enter the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP) every year and conduct research by partnering with a mentor. Mentoring is a complex practice that not only impacts students' academics, but drives their careers. However, poor quality mentorship has the capacity to undermine students' performance and motivation. To mitigate this, the Center for Undergraduate Research and Academic Excellence (CRE) hosts mentor training for graduate students to raise awareness about effective strategies to foster positive mentoring relationships. This research examines both sides of mentoring relationships and their impact on students' outcomes, with an aim to understand and improve mentoring relationships throughout FSU. The literature shows that high quality mentorship stresses open communication and flexibility with mentees. On the contrary, absenteeism and unreasonable expectations can be characteristics of poor-quality mentorship. In our research, we used a qualitative approach, using data from UROP mentoring philosophies, and coded them to observe the trends of positive and negative mentoring practices. We also analyzed paired student and mentor evaluations to understand how submitted philosophies are related to student satisfaction and growth in research outcomes. Our analysis includes documenting the frequency of different mentoring strategies and identifying patterns. Our findings will be used to enhance the current research mentor training curriculum and develop workshops for all research mentors.

Screenshot 2026-03-12 at 11.51.33 PM.png

Keywords: Mentorship, mentoring, Students